Attitudinal Differences among Market Users in the Utilization of Environmental Sanitation and Waste Management Infrastructure in Major Markets of Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23158213Keywords:
Environmental sanitation, Waste management, Market users, Environmental attitude, Sanitation infrastructure, Sustainable development, Akwa Ibom State.Abstract
Environmental sanitation infrastructure is fundamental to achieving healthy market environments, promoting public health, and ensuring sustainable urban development. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of sanitation infrastructure depends not only on its availability but also on the willingness of users to utilize it appropriately. This study assessed the attitudinal differences among market users in the utilization of available environmental sanitation and waste management infrastructure in major markets of Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. A descriptive survey research design was adopted using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Primary data were obtained through structured questionnaires administered to 380 respondents selected through stratified and simple random sampling techniques from nine major markets across the three senatorial districts of Akwa Ibom State. Additional data were collected through field observation and key informant interviews with officials of environmental management agencies and market associations. Descriptive statistics, mean score analysis, Relative Importance Index (RII), independent sample t-test, and one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were employed for data analysis. The findings revealed significant variations in market users' attitudes towards the utilization of sanitation infrastructure. While respondents demonstrated positive attitudes towards routine sanitation activities such as sweeping trading spaces, payment of sanitation levies, and participation in monthly environmental sanitation exercises, relatively poor attitudes were observed regarding waste segregation, recycling, and the utilization of designated waste storage facilities. Educational attainment, environmental awareness, accessibility of sanitation infrastructure, and institutional enforcement significantly influenced sanitation behaviour among market users (p < 0.05). The study concludes that behavioural change remains a critical determinant of environmental sanitation effectiveness in markets. It recommends continuous environmental education, improved sanitation infrastructure, stronger institutional enforcement, and active participation of market associations in sanitation management to promote sustainable waste management practices in major markets.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Akwa Ibom Agricultural Development Programme (AKADEP). (2006). Akwa Ibom State agricultural development profile. AKADEP.
Arthur, R., & Imoro, A. Z. (2021). Solid waste management practices among market users in selected urban markets in Ghana. Journal of Environmental Management, 286, 112210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112210
Ekong, C. N. (2016). Geomorphology of Akwa Ibom State. University of Uyo Press.
Ferronato, N., & Torretta, V. (2019). Waste mismanagement in developing countries: A review of global issues. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(6), 1060. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061060
Fakere, A. A., & Fadamiro, J. A. (2012). Assessment of public market sanitation in selected Nigerian cities. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 14(6), 169–182.
Guerrero, L. A., Maas, G., & Hogland, W. (2013). Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Management, 33(1), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.008
Hoornweg, D., & Bhada-Tata, P. (2012). What a waste: A global review of solid waste management. World Bank.
Mariwah, S. (2012). Institutional arrangements for solid waste management in the Shama-Ahanta-East Metropolitan Area, Ghana. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 14(6), 136–154.
National Population Commission (NPC). (2024). Population projections for Nigerian states, 2024. National Population Commission.
Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NiMet). (2024). 2024 seasonal climate prediction. Nigerian Meteorological Agency.
Ogwueleka, T. C. (2009). Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Nigeria. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, 6(3), 173–180.
Sridhar, M. K. C., Oluborode, J. A., & Uwadiegwu, B. O. (2017). Municipal solid waste management in Nigeria: Problems, prospects, and policy implications. Waste Management & Research, 35(2), 102–109.
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations.
United Nations Environment Programme. (2024). Global waste management outlook 2024. United Nations Environment Programme.
United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). (2020). Strategy for solid waste management. UN-Habitat.
Udobia, E. E., & Akpan, I. A. (2023). Waste management practices and environmental sustainability in Southern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Environmental Management, 27(1), 41–56.
World Bank. (2022). What a waste 2.0: Trends in solid waste management. World Bank.
World Health Organization. (2022). Guidelines on sanitation and health. World Health Organization.
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Asuquo, Joyce Benson, Uwem, Ituen (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (CC BY 4.0 deed)