Mental Health in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Implications for Work and Social Relations

Authors

  • Edime YUNUSA, Ph.D Author
  • Ejuchegahi Anthony ANGWAOMAODOKO Author
  • Timothy Abayomi ATOYEBI, Ph.D Author
  • Julius Olugbenga OWOYEMI, Ph.D Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20781131

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Mental Health, Psychological Well-being, Work, Employee Well-being, Social Relations

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly shaping how people work, interact, communicate, and manage their psychological well-being, making it one of the most influential technological developments of the contemporary era. While AI presents significant opportunities for enhancing productivity, access to information, and mental health support, concerns have emerged regarding its implications for employee well-being, social connectedness, and human relationships. Against this backdrop, this paper examined mental health in the age of Artificial Intelligence with particular focus on its implications for work and social relations. Specifically, the paper investigated the influence of Artificial Intelligence on mental health and psychological well-being, examined its implications for job experiences, workplace stress, and employee well-being, and assessed its effects on social relations, interpersonal interactions, and social connectedness. The paper was anchored on the Socio-Technical Systems Theory which explains the interdependence between technological systems and human social systems. Adopting a systematic literature review approach based on the PRISMA framework, evidence was synthesised from peer-reviewed studies retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The  paper revealed that AI has improved access to mental health support, enhanced workplace efficiency, and facilitated communication and social engagement. However, the paper also identified concerns relating to psychological dependency, job insecurity, workplace stress, algorithmic surveillance, social isolation, and weakened interpersonal interactions. The paper concluded that the outcomes of AI depend largely on how technological innovations are integrated into human-centred social and organisational systems. It recommended the adoption of human-centred AI policies, investment in digital skills and employee support programmes, and the development of ethical safeguards that promote healthy social interactions and psychological well-being.

References

Abdi, J., Al-Hindawi, A., Ng, T., & Vizcaychipi, M. P. (2021). Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open, 11(2), e045315.

Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2023). Power and progress: Our thousand-year struggle over technology and prosperity. PublicAffairs.

Bednar, P. M., & Welch, C. (2020). Socio-technical perspectives on smart working: Creating meaningful and sustainable systems. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(2), 281–298.

Brooks, S., Chadwick, K., de Vos, A., Lawrence, K., et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence, intimate relationships and mental health. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 42(8), 2157–2178.

Caluori, L. (2024). Hey Alexa, why are you called intelligent? An empirical investigation on definitions of AI. AI & Society, 39(4), 1905–1919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01643-y

Dehbozorgi, R., Zangeneh, S., Khooshab, E., Hafezi Nia, D., Hanif, H. R., Samian, P., Yousefi, M., & Haj Hashemi, F. (2025). The application of artificial intelligence in the field of mental health: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 25, 132.

Dell’Acqua, F., McFowland, E., Mollick, E., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Kellogg, K. C., Rajendran, S., Krayer, L., Candelon, F., & Lakhani, K. R. (2023). Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality (Working Paper No. 24-013). Harvard Business School.

Fanarioti, A., & Karpouzis, K. (2025). Artificial intelligence and the future of mental health in a digitally transformed world. Computers, 14(7), Article 259.

Guess, A. M., Nyhan, B., Lyons, B., & Reifler, J. (2023). Avoiding the echo chamber about echo chambers: Why selective exposure to like-minded political news is less prevalent than you think. Knight First Amendment Institute.

Jarrahi, M. H., Lutz, C., Newlands, G., Lee, M. K., Wolf, C. T., Kinder, E., & Tampe, M. (2023). Algorithmic management in a work context. Big Data & Society, 10(1).

Jin, G., Jiang, J., & Liao, H. (2024). The work affective well-being under the impact of AI. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 25483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75113-w

Kalota, F. (2024). A primer on generative artificial intelligence. Education Sciences, 14(2), 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020172

Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410.

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01). Keele University and Durham University.

Kolding, S., Lundin, R. M., Hansen, L., & Østergaard, S. D. (2024). Use of generative artificial intelligence in psychiatry and mental health care: A systematic review. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 78(7), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2024.2410481

Lancman, S., Bicudo, S. P. B. C., Rodrigues, D. S., Nogueira, L. F. Z., Barros, J. O., & Barroso, B. I. L. (2024). Mental health and work: A systematic review of the concept. Healthcare, 12(23), 2377.

Liu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Understanding and facilitating mental health help-seeking of young adults: A socio-technical ecosystem framework. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW), Article 198.

Magalhães, E. (2024). Dual-factor models of mental health: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Psychosocial Intervention, 33(2), 89–102.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.

Ozkaya, I., Ivezic, N., Davis, J., Breaux, T. D., & Sarjoughian, H. (2024). General purpose artificial intelligence systems (GPAIS): Properties, definition, taxonomy, societal implications and responsible governance. Information Fusion, 103, 102135.

Pandey, H. M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in mental health and well-being: Evolution, current applications, future challenges, and emerging evidence. arXiv.

Pasmore, W. A., Winby, S., Mohrman, S. A., & Vanasse, R. (2019). Reflections: Sociotechnical systems design and organisation change. Journal of Change Management, 19(2), 67–85.

Pentina, I., Hancock, T., & Xie, T. (2023). Exploring relationship development with social chatbots: A mixed-method study of Replika users. Computers in Human Behavior, 140, 107600.

Reuters. (2026, May 5). Young Europeans turn to AI chatbots for emotional support, survey shows.

Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2024). Defining intelligence: Bridging the gap between human and artificial perspectives. Intelligence, 104, 101832.

Tang, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, M., & Chen, H. (2023). Artificial intelligence capability and employee well-being: The mediating role of work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1189905.

Tarafdar, M., Beath, C. M., Ross, J. W., & Saunders, C. (2025). Managing AI-induced technostress in organisations. MIS Quarterly Executive, 24(1), 1–16.

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(45), 1–10.

Trist, E. L. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems (Occasional Paper No. 2). Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre.

Trist, E. L., & Emery, F. E. (1951). The causal texture of organisational environments. Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.

Turkle, S. (2024). Artificial intimacy: Virtual companions and the future of human connection. Daedalus, 153(2), 53–67.

Vallas, S. P., & Schor, J. B. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 273–294.

Wang, X., Zhou, Y., & Zhou, G. (2025). The application and ethical implication of generative AI in mental health: Systematic review. JMIR Mental Health, 12, e70610.

World Health Organization. (2022). World mental health report: Transforming mental health for all. World Health Organization.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mental Health in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Implications for Work and Social Relations. (2026). Unifya, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20781131

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.